You Don't Need A Two-Page Resume
Jonathan Wong / January 14, 2020
4 min read • ––– views
Over the years, I've had many resume iterations. As I moved into my new role last month, I went to update my resume — That's when I realized it was terrible.
This is going to be a sort of resume retrospective. Basically, I'm just going to roast myself. Laugh at my mistakes and learn from my failures.
2016 Resume#
This was my resume out of college which helped me land my first full-time engineering job. There were more resume iterations before this, obviously, but they were terrible. Let me save some dignity.
Okay, I'll start with the good.
- It's one page. The layout is clean and comfortable to read. Good job, Lee.
- The job title is more prominent than the employer.
- Most bullet points are useful (not too much content).
- Projects and GPA are still relevant because I'm fresh out of college.
What about the bad?
- This thing is written with LaTeX. Why? Because that's what everyone on Reddit did. Talk about over-engineering.
- My middle name is not relevant. My name isn't that generic.
- My phone number is not needed. This trend persisted for a while.
- Some of the bullet points talk about what I did instead of the impact I made.
- "Videographer" is not relevant to the position I'm interviewing for.
2017 Resume#
In 2017, I got the bright idea to re-design my resume. The content didn't change much.
There's some good:
- At a glance, you can quickly parse the content.
- Easy to read font.
- Education moved down now that I have a full-time job.
There are some issues, though:
- This custom Photoshop design did not work well with Applicant Tracking Systems, or ATS for short. Which is, ya know, the whole point 🤦🏻♂️
- The location of the companies is not relevant.
2018 Resume#
In 2018, I switched jobs. Time to dust off the ol' resume. But, just when you thought it couldn't get worse...
I made this thing with InDesign.
It had an embedded font. Well, it turns out the embedded font didn't work in Firefox. So the resume was basically unreadable in some cases.
I don't have much good to say here, so let's just go straight to the bad:
- The about section is a complete waste of space. Save it for LinkedIn.
- References are not needed on the resume.
- I'm not sure why I decided to drop the start and end dates from my work positions. "3 years" isn't very descriptive.
- The GitHub link is unnecessary. You can find it on my website.
2019 Resume#
Brace yourself. We've now reached peak monstrosity.
I finally gave up on custom designs and opted to use a service called Standard Resume. It was easy, required little maintenance, and worked much better with ATS.
Plus, I thought, let's add every single thing I've ever accomplished. I committed the ultimate sin. I made a two-page resume.
Some things are good:
- The skills section made a comeback. ATS love those buzzwords.
- Some of the newer bullet points have excellent metrics.
- It's a wonderful design. Easy to read.
But others are bad. Really bad:
- I've been out of college long enough that I can drop the internships.
- Instead of putting freelance dev work, I put a project (dsmtech).
- GPA is not relevant anymore. Then again... was it ever relevant?
- Did I mention it's 2 pages? No one has time for that.
2020 Resume#
That brings us to now. Behold, this single sheet of (digital) paper.
I made this with Pages on Mac. No custom fonts. No crazy design. I'd like to think it's the culmination of all the points made above.
- It's easy to update and maintain.
- The font is readable, and there's a good use of bold and italic.
- Unnecessary information is omitted (GPA, projects, internships, phone number).
- More relevant information is included (skills, freelance work).
- Industry normalized job title (Software Engineer III -> Senior Software Engineer).
- There are clear start/end dates with the same format throughout.
- Proper use of whitespace.
You don't need a two-page resume.